Verified ruling
Reserved for an outcome confirmed against the applicable published rules by a qualified, verified reviewer or an identified governing-body source. The source and ruleset version should remain visible with the ruling.
Loading page.
About · trust model
ClearCall is a public, short-form decision-training prototype for aspiring and active sports officials. Learners make a call, record their confidence and reasoning, then compare the factors behind different decisions. Educators, officials, coaches, and fans can use the same structure to discuss why a call changes—not only which option received the most votes.
What each decision status means
Reserved for an outcome confirmed against the applicable published rules by a qualified, verified reviewer or an identified governing-body source. The source and ruleset version should remain visible with the ruling.
Qualified reviewers broadly agree on the recommended decision, while the incident may still involve interpretation. Consensus is useful training evidence, but it is not official guidance unless an official source says so.
The case is unresolved, interpretive, or has not received qualified review. Public responses can surface reasoning and disagreement; they do not create an authoritative answer by popularity.
In the intended trust model, authority comes from a named source and review process—not vote count. A qualified reviewer checks the incident facts, applicable ruleset and version, rule citation, and recommended outcome before a case can carry a verified status.
This frontend prototype does not implement production credential verification, moderation, or governing-body approval.
Public results answer, “How did the wider community decide?” Verified-reviewer results answer, “How did qualified officials assess the case?” Keeping the distributions separate makes disagreement visible without presenting a public majority as verified truth.
In this demo, every displayed distribution is authored and synthetic; none is a count of real community or verified-reviewer responses.
ClearCall is designed for team-recorded, openly licensed, or otherwise authorized footage. A discussion may point to an attributed external source where that platform and the rights holder permit it; it is not permission to scrape, copy, or rehost professional broadcasts.
A production service would also need attribution, rights review, reporting, and removal workflows. This prototype includes a browser-local report dialog, copyright warning, and flagged-content removal queue on the profile page—not a live moderation backend.
Authored demonstration material only. The scenario, percentages, comments, and recommended decision require review by a qualified soccer officiating expert before production use; they are not official governing-body guidance.
The status definitions above document the intended product model. The seeded dataset remains marked for review and does not claim that credential checks or qualified expert review have occurred.